SSL Certificate
Books, Articles, Videos, and Speeches by Dr. Richard A. Warshak
These links go to pages with information about each item: CR01 | CR03 | CR04 | CR05 | CR07 | CR08 | CR09 | CR12 | CR13 | CR14 | CR15 | CR16 | CR17 | CR18 | CR19 | CR20 | CR21 | CR22 | CR23 | CR24 | CR25 | CR27 | CR28 | CR30 | CR31 | CR32 | CR37| CR41 | CR43 | CR44 | CR45 | CR48 | CR52 | CR53 | CR54 | CR55 | CR56 | CR57 | CR61 | CR62 | CR63 | CR64 | CR66 | CR68 | CR71 | WBP01-02 | WBP-DL | WPQ | DP
Ground-breaking strategies for effective management of parental alienation cases
The University of Texas School of Law and the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers-Texas Chapter included this monograph-length paper in course material for a 2014 conference on custody litigation. The paper expands on Dr. Warshak’s previous work and presents a wealth of new material directly relevant to litigation of cases that raise parental alienation issues.
One of the most valuable sections presents the first comprehensive analysis of how and why temporary suspension of children’s contact with their favored parent can serve ten aims consistent with children’s best interests. The discussion explains how a no-contact order between children and alienating parents can make it easier for the children to heal their damaged relationships with their rejected parents. The discussion draws from Dr. Warshak’s experience in helping severely alienated children and adolescents successfully reunite with a parent whom they have unreasonably rejected. The rationale for no-contact orders has not appeared in this depth in any of Dr. Warshak’s prior publications and has never been described by other scholars.
The list and discussion of ten reasons why courts find it to be in children’s best interests to suspend their contact with the favored parent can inform what the rejected parent seeks from the court and provide arguments in favor of this position. Such arguments can serve as organizing themes in the presentation of the case, in opening and closing arguments, and in examination of witnesses.
Among the highlights of this paper:
This paper incorporates some material from Dr. Warshak’s prior work: It describes common behaviors and characteristics displayed by severely alienated children and the harmful impacts of parent alienation on children’s current and future psychological development. These impacts provide the rationale for interventions to remedy the problem. The contributions of education, psychotherapy, and court orders to preventing alienation from developing or from becoming more severe are discussed. The paper describes the potential benefits and drawbacks of the four main options for courts in cases with alienated children. Some concerns about mental health evidence are discussed along with the risks of intervening versus maintaining the status quo in families with alienated children. Next is a description of Family Bridges, an innovative program to help alienated children successfully reunite with their rejected parents. The paper ends with detailed practice tips for lawyers representing a parent who is alienated or at risk for becoming alienated, tips for lawyers representing a parent who is alleged to be alienating the children, and tips for judges with a case that raises parental alienation issues.
If you have only one article to use in preparing a parental alienation case, this is it.
CR57